The NBRA has started a campaign that I thought important enough to throw my support behind. I have said over and over again that the democrat socialist party and the liberal socialism it spreads, is the worse enemy not only to America but especially black America. Its time black Americans returned to the party of Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. and left the party of Maxine Waters, Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama.
Our 4-step 2008 Victory Plan:
• Recruit and train black church and community leaders to spread our conservative Republican message
• Script, produce and air our hard-hitting radio and TV ads for black radio and TV outlets
• Put up MLK billboards across America
• Publish and distribute our very effective magazine, The Black Republican
Frances Rice, Chairman
National Black Republican Association
Visit their site today and if possible donate to help them help America.
We have to take this as a warning and call to action. We must ensure this does not become the norm across our fruited plains, I say again, no matter where you are, engage your friends, family, co-workers and anyone else who will listen to make sure they get out and vote republican. Our future depends on it.
By JACQUES STEINBERG
Rush Limbaugh took his show on the road this week, forsaking his main broadcast studio in Palm Beach, Fla., for one in Midtown Manhattan. But the change of scenery did nothing to dampen the Republican-on-Republican smackdown he has been waging from afar against Senator John McCain, the party’s likely presidential nominee, whom Mr. Limbaugh considers too moderate.
As he opened his radio program Wednesday, Mr. Limbaugh lobbed yet another grenade.
Well Mitt you went and did it didn’t you? You went from my number two choice behind Fred Thompson to dropping out and then finally to hitting bottom by endorsing John "don’t piss me off" McCain. I can understand the concept of "taking one for the team" and a part of me doesn’t blame you. But…
I feel if you had just remained quite and went about returning to your
Governor(correction via Wickle), fatherly duties, we all would have felt a lot better about life and kept what high opinion’s we had of you intact. But, you went and did it anyway didn’t you?One of the smartest political minds in America wrote an article that nicely sums up the state of conservatism. Preach on Newt, preach on,,, TRM
A Conservative Declaration of Independence and the Democrats’ Dilemma
This weekend, I had the opportunity to address CPAC — the Conservative Political Action Conference. This is the same group to which Ronald Reagan delivered his historic "bold colors, not pale pastels" speech in 1975, sparking a new center-right coalition that would become the ground troops of the Reagan Revolution.
by Ann Coulter
A few more primary wins and B. Hussein Obama will be able to light up a cigarette during a televised speech and still get the nomination. It looks like the only thing that can stop him now is an endorsement from Al Gore.
Gore is always lunging into a movement just as it has passed its prime — the Internet, Howard Dean, global warming, trying to talk black when he campaigns at a black church. He probably bought a big house a few months ago. Gore is such a supremely unlikable human being, he even subverted the mainstream media’s affection for liberalism during the 2000 election.
A quick note to let you know you can get your free pocket Constitution here. Next time a liberal spout’s idiocy, you have the most perfect document ever written to shoot them down.
by TRM
McCain’s speech given at CPAC almost made me want to vomit. He mentioned G-D, conservative values, Ronald Reagan, taxes, illegal immigration (he apologized), and his absence at last year’s conference (apologized again). In my humble opinion it was one of the most pathetic attempts to pander I have ever seen. The only time I became more violently ill is watching Queen Hillary do it, at least she doesn’t try as hard to hide her socialist leanings. He was booed, jeered and met with silence a few times, and this idiot is going to be the nominee!? A little bit of southern knowledge to share with you all, if he were the real deal, he wouldn’t have had to spend all the time he did at the convention "telling" us how much of a conservative he is. It would be obvious were he the real deal. One little nugget during his "speech" was that he would not allow the expansion of entitlement programs (welfare). The idiot should be scaling them back on a huge scale, not giving lip service to the rest of us true conservative Americans, the only true American’s. Sorry lefty’s, that’s just how I feel.
Suspended? What the hell does that mean? You holding your delegates? Are you in or are you out?
McCain makes me sick,,,, I’M VOTIN OBAMA!
If you haven’t see this skit yet you’ll be thanking me for posting it here. Let’s pretend the "landlord" is a ruthless capitalist republican and the "evictee" is a middle aged democrat peace activist. Get it?
The Landlord on FunnyOrDie.com
by Ann Coulter
Nominating McCain is the gesture of a desperate party.
Republicans are so shell-shocked and demoralized by the success of the Bush Derangement Syndrome, they think they can fool the voters by nominating an open-borders, anti-tax cut, anti-free speech, global-warming hysteric, pro-human experimentation "Republican." Which is to say, a Democrat.
As the expression goes, given a choice between a Democrat and a Democrat, voters will always choose the Democrat. The only question remaining is: Hillary or Obama?
On the litmus test issues of our time, only partially excluding Iraq, McCain is a liberal.
– He excoriated Samuel Alito as too "conservative."
– He promoted amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants.
– He abridged citizens’ free speech (in favor of the media) with McCain-Feingold.
– He hysterically opposes waterboarding terrorists and wants to shut down Guantanamo.
Can I take a breath now?
– He denounced the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
– He opposes ANWR and supports the global warming cult, even posturing with fellow mountebank Arnold Schwarzenegger in front of solar panels.
The only site that would have been more appropriate for Schwarzenegger in endorsing McCain would have been in front of an abortion clinic.
Although McCain has the minimum pro-life record demanded by the voters of Arizona, in 2006, McCain voted in favor of using taxpayer funds to harvest stem cells from human embryos. He opposes a constitutional amendment to protect human life. And he frets that if Roe v. Wade were overruled, women’s lives would be "endangered." This is the same John McCain who chides Mitt Romney today for "flip-flopping" on abortion. At least Romney flips and stays there.
Of course the most important issue for pro-lifers is the Supreme Court. As long as Roe v. Wade is the law of the land, it doesn’t matter how many hearts and minds we’ve changed. So it’s not insignificant that McCain has called Justice Samuel Alito too conservative.
We ended up with David Hackett Souter when a Republican president was actually looking for an Alito. Imagine how bad it will be when the "Republican" president isn’t even trying.
McCain uses the boilerplate language of all Republicans in saying he will appoint "strict constructionists." This is supposed to end all discussion of the courts. But if he’s picking strict constructionists, he will have to appoint judges who will commit to overturning McCain-Feingold.
That could be our litmus test: Will you hold President McCain’s signature legislation restricting speech unconstitutional?
In 2004, McCain criticized the federal marriage amendment, saying, it was "antithetical in every way to the core philosophy of Republicans." Really? Preventing the redefinition of a 10,000-year-old institution — marriage, that is, not John McCain — is part of the core philosophy of being a Republican? I had no idea.
I’m not a lawyer — oh wait, yes, I am — but Republicans were proposing to amend the Constitution, a process the Constitution specifically describes.
It’s like saying it’s antithetical to the core philosophy of Republicans to require presidents to be at least 35 years old. It’s in the Constitution! And Republicans — other than the ones who voted for McCain-Feingold — support the Constitution. You might say it’s part of our core philosophy.
Of course, back in 2004, McCain was considering running on a presidential ticket with John Kerry. Realizing that this would not help his chances to run as a Republican in 2008, when he would be a mere 120 years old, McCain quickly withdrew his interest in being on Kerry’s ticket.
But he defended Kerry from the Bush campaign’s suggestion that Kerry was not tip-top on national security, saying on the "Today" show: "No, I do not believe that he is, quote, weak on defense." So that was helpful.
McCain also explained to an admiring press corps why he wouldn’t want to be anyone’s vice president, not even a national defense champion like Kerry, citing the meager constitutional duties of the vice president as: (1) to assume the presidency if the president is incapacitated and (2) "to break a tie vote in the Senate." (At which point several members of the fawning horde were heard to remark, "What is this ‘Constitution’ you speak of, Senator?")
But McCain conveniently forgot the second of these constitutional duties just a year later when Vice President Cheney was required "to break a tie vote in the Senate" on a matter of utmost importance to liberals: federal judges.
Just one year after McCain had correctly identified one of two jobs of the vice president, he was indignant that a Republican vice president might actually exercise one of them. Better to let a gaggle of 14 Senate malcontents pick the president’s judges for him.
As part of the "Gang of 14," McCain hysterically opposed allowing the vice president to break a tie on judicial nominations. Following the Constitution with regard to the role of the vice president, McCain said, "would be a terrible precedent." Yes, if members of Congress actually read the Constitution, they might realize McCain-Feingold is unconstitutional.
If Hillary is elected president, we’ll have a four-year disaster, with Republicans ferociously opposing her, followed by Republicans zooming back into power, as we did in 1980 and 1994, and 2000. (I also predict more Oval Office incidents with female interns.)
If McCain is elected president, we’ll have a four-year disaster, with the Republicans in Congress co-opted by "our" president, followed by 30 years of Democratic rule.
There’s your choice, America.
Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and author of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors," "Slander," ""How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)," "Godless," and most recently, "If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans."
Here is a little test that will help you decide. The answer can be found by posing the following question:
You’re walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, an Islamic Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, praises Allah, raises the knife, and charges at you.
You are carrying a Glock 45 ACP, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.
What do you do?
by TRM
I know we’re all tired of hearing all the Ronald Reagan this, Ronald Reagan that, from every direction these days. It’s a tribute to the man and his accomplishments that his name is invoked so often in the GOP. I don’t much care for the candidates scrambling to claim his mantle though. Can’t be done, it’s a different time, different country. Conservatism has never changed only the players.
In the 80’s I was a teenager and didn’t give two damn’s about politics, without going into detail, we all know what dominates the thoughts of any teenage male and I was no different, probably worse. But for some reason I still have a hard time convincing my niece and daughters that I know exactly what is on the mind of that "boy" scratching around the back door or calling my phone. How could crusty ‘ole TRM know anything about love, emotions and the filthy thoughts of that ‘lil sumbitch calling my house? Enough of that.
Today’s President Reagan’s birthday and if you get a chance, try to think back to the Reagan years and if your like me, you’ll remember what a Grand Old Party it was…
I am curious to see if this really happens or is just another election year bunch of lip service. The one earmark/pork that stands out above all others is Hillary Clinton’s tax money aimed at building, of all things, a Woodstock Museum. TRM
A few weeks ago, I called on the President and Congress to listen to the demands for real change coming from the American people in campaign ‘08 and to act immediately — without waiting for the election.
Speaking directly to the President and Congress, this is what I said:
Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.